Open exchange of scientific knowledge and European copyright: The case of biodiversity information

Background. The 7^th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development is helping the European Union to prepare for an integrative system for intelligent management of biodiversity knowledge. The infrastructure that is envisaged and that will be further developed within the Programme “Horizon 2020” aims to provide open and free access to taxonomic information to anyone with a requirement for biodiversity data, without the need for individual consent of other persons or institutions. Open and free access to information will foster the re-use and improve the quality of data, will accelerate research, and will promote new types of research. Progress towards the goal of free and open access to content is hampered by numerous technical, economic, sociological, legal, and other factors. The present article addresses barriers to the open exchange of biodiversity knowledge that arise from European laws, in particular European legislation on copyright and database protection rights.We present a legal point of view as to what will be needed to bring distributed information together and facilitate its re-use by data mining, integration into semantic knowledge systems, and similar techniques. We address exceptions and limitations of copyright or database protection within Europe, and we point to the importance of data use agreements. We illustrate how exceptions and limitations have been transformed into national legislations within some European states to create inconsistencies that impede access to biodiversity information.Conclusions. The legal situation within the EU is unsatisfactory because there are inconsistencies among states that hamper the deployment of an open biodiversity knowledge management system. Scientists within the EU who work with copyright protected works or with protected databases have to be aware of regulations that vary from country to country. This is a major stumbling block to international collaboration and is an impediment to the open exchange of biodiversity knowledge. Such differences should be removed by unifying exceptions and limitations for research purposes in a binding, Europe-wide regulation.     

A preliminary note on Incurvarioidea in New Zealand

Abstract

The Monotrysian superfamily Incurvarioidea (Lepidoptera) is now known to be present inNew Zealand. A mummified partly decayed male, parasitised pupae, larval head capsules, and characteristic cocoons are associated with long (1500–2000 mm) meandering cortical scribble-like mines in sapling Weinmannia, Nothofagus and Myrsine. The fragments and larval biology display features of Prodoxidae, but cannot be assigned to a genus.

Wing pattern, some forewing venation, pupal structure, male genitalia and some female ovipositor structures, larval head capsule and pronotum, and details of the pupal cell and larval mine are described and illustrated.     

Taxonomy of some common Amphidinium species

The taxonomic status of several well known species belonging to the genus Amphidinium (Dinophyceae) has been re-examined. Studies in culture and observations on the micro-anatomy of these organisms suggest that the number of species can be reduced to two, A. klebsii and A. carterae. They may be distinguished on the basis of fundamental differences in chloroplast morphology.     

Two new genera of cyclopinid copepods (Cyclopoida: Gyclopinidae) from anchihaline caves of the Canary and Balearic Islands, with a key to genera of the family

The presence of an endemic cyclopoid fauna in anchihaline caves is confirmed in this paper after the discovery of two new genera of cyclopinids in caves of the Canary and Balearic Islands. Oromiina fortunata sp. nov. is described from a flooded lava tube in Lanzarote; it is characterized by the extraordinary length attained by the antennae. Ginesia longi-caudata sp. nov. is described from a flooded karstic cave in Mallorca. The body is ornamented dorsally with conspicuous integumental outgrowths, and along the lateral margins of both the cephalosome and the second pedigerous somite of male, by a linear array of pores. The new taxa are most closely related to forms found in the shallow water hyperbenthos, although one trait of Ginesia suggest an affinity with deep water taxa since, for example, the linear arrays of pores were previously known only in Cyclopicina within the Cyclopinidae. A key to the 37 genera of the family Cyclopinidae is presented.     

Craniofacial ontogeny in centrosaurine dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Geratopsidae): taxonomic and behavioral implications

Centrosaurine ceratopsians are characterized by well developed nasal horncores or bosses, relatively abbreviated supraorbital horncores or bosses, and adorned parietosquamosal frills. Recent study of several paucispecific (low diversity) bonebed assemblages in Alberta and Montana has contributed greatly to our understanding of ontogenetic and taxonomic variation in the skulls of centrosaurines. Relative age determination of centrosaurines is now possible through examination of ontogenetic change in several characters, including the surface bone morphology of specific skeletal elements. The within-group taxonomy of centrosaurines is based almost entirely on characters of the skull roof, relating particularly to horns and frills. Juvenile and sub-adult centrosaurines are characterized by relatively simple, unadorned skulls compared to their adult counterparts. As in numerous living taxa, the cranial ornaments of centrosaurines developed late in ontogeny, as individuals approached or attained adult size. An important implication arising directly from this study is that juvenile and sub-adult centrosaurines are difficult to distinguish taxonomically at the specific level. Two monospecific genera represented only by immature materials, Brachyceratops montanensis and Monoclonius crassus , cannot be defended and should be considered nomina dubia . The late ontogenetic development and diverse taxonomic variation of horn and frill morphologies support the contention diat these structures are best interpreted as reproductive characters employed in mate competition.     

Description de Quelques Espèces de Ciliés Hyménostomes des Genres Sathrophilus Corliss, 1960, Cyclidium O. F. Müller, 1786, Histiobalantium Stokes, 1886

RESUME. Les structures buccales de Sathrophilus vernalis Dragesco & Grolière, 1969 sont détaillées. La morphogenèse buccale de l'opisthe, semi-autonome, avec participation du scuticus et d'une cinétie postorale droite, s'accompagne d'une re-constitution de l'appareil buccal du proter. La morphologie buccale de Cyclidium sphagnetorum Šràmek-Hušek, 1949 est comparée à celles de Cyclidium citrullus Cohn, 1865 et Cyclidium glaucoma O. F. Müller, 1786. La stomatogenèse Histiobalantium majus Kahl, 1933 débute par une prolifération du scuticus vers la gauche.
SYNOPSIS. Buccal structures of Sathrophilus vernalis Dragesco & Grolière, 1969 are described. The semiautonomous buccal morphogenesis of the opisthe, involving the participation of the scuticus and the right postoral kinety, is accompanied by the reconstitution of the buccal apparatus of the proter. The buccal structure of Cyclidium sphagnetorum Šràmek-Hušek, 1949 is compared to those of Cyclidium citrullus Cohn, 1865 and Cyclidium glaucoma O. F. Müller, 1786. Stomatogenesis of Histiobalantidium majus Kahl, 1933 starts with a proliferation of the scuticus towards the left.